Logan Tribe I. O. R. M. v. Schwartz

19 Md. 565, 1863 Md. LEXIS 20
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMay 5, 1863
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 Md. 565 (Logan Tribe I. O. R. M. v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Logan Tribe I. O. R. M. v. Schwartz, 19 Md. 565, 1863 Md. LEXIS 20 (Md. 1863).

Opinion

Bowie, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of this Court:

The appellee, widow of Simon Schwartz, instituted suit against the appellant, to recover certain benefit dues which she claimed to be owing to her, as widow of the deceased, [571]*571under tbo Charter and By-Laws of the Society of which her husband was a member.

(Decided May 5th, 1863.)

The defendant, the appellant, (after the evidence had been closed,) prayed the Court to instruct the jury, that if they believe from the evidence, Simon Schwartz, the appellee’s husband, was, on the 1st of April 1856, in arrear for weekly dues to the Society for more than three months, and was also in arrear for other weekly dues for more than three months, at the time of his death, then the plaintiff is not entitled to recover, which instruction the Court refused, and the judgment being for plaintiff, the defendant appealed.

In the opinion of a majority of this Court, the defendant’s prayer was based upon a correct construction of the Charter and By-Laws of the Association under which the plaintiff claimed. The payment of the dues referred to, being a condition precedent to the plaintiff’s right to recover, whether the dues were in arrear or not, was a fact proper to be submitted to the jury, with the instruction prayed. The Court having refused the same, the judgment below should he reversed, and procedendo awarded.

Judgment reversed, and procedendo awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Houten v. Pine
36 N.J. Eq. 133 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Md. 565, 1863 Md. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/logan-tribe-i-o-r-m-v-schwartz-md-1863.