Home/Appellate Court of Illinois/Loftus v. Behrens

Loftus v. Behrens

187 Ill. App. 598
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJuly 31, 1914
DocketGen. No. 5,909
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 187 Ill. App. 598 (Loftus v. Behrens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loftus v. Behrens, 187 Ill. App. 598 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Sales, § 186*—when delivery not essential. As between the parties, delivery is not essential to a complete sale, unless so intended by them. 3. Sales, § 18*—when instruction as to unqualified offer and acceptance correct. An instruction that an unqualified offer and acceptance constituted a valid sale of chattel property, and that if the defendant made an unqualified offer for the property, which was accepted by the plaintiff, and that if the parties then intended the sale to be complete the verdict should be for the plaintiff, held to state a correct principle of law. 4. Appeal and eeeob, § 1533*—when underscoring words in instruction harmless. The underscoring of the words “your verdict” in an instruction held harmless.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Banking Co. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
248 Ill. App. 385 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 Ill. App. 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loftus-v-behrens-illappct-1914.