Lofton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lofton v. State

658 So. 2d 1235, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8693, 1995 WL 488202

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 17, 1995

DocketNo. 94-2739

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 658 So. 2d 1235 (Lofton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lofton v. State, 658 So. 2d 1235, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8693, 1995 WL 488202 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his conviction and sentence for carrying a concealed firearm. He asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the physical evidence against him. We agree and reverse.

The encounter between the police and appellant cannot be considered to be a consensual encounter in light of the restrictions placed on appellant’s freedom to leave. Popple v. State, 626 So.2d 185 (Fla.1993); Cowart v. State, 635 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). In addition, there was insufficient evidence to establish a reasonable suspicion to justify a temporary detention of appellant. See Hills v. State, 629 So.2d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

Accordingly, appellant’s judgment of conviction is reversed.

ERVIN, WOLF and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI