Lofton v. State

517 So. 2d 700, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2683, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11167, 1987 WL 1917
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 25, 1987·No. No. 87-1620·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

COWART, Judge.

Appellant’s departure sentence based on the habitual offender statute is vacated and this cause remanded for resentencing under the sentencing guidelines. See Frierson v. State, 511 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) and Kersey v. State, 515 So.2d 261 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and ORFINGER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lofton v. State, 517 So. 2d 700, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2683, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11167, 1987 WL 1917 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

517 So. 2d 700 (Lofton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lofton
534 So. 2d 1148 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Location 100, Inc. v. Gould SEL Computer Systems, Inc.
517 So. 2d 700 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)