Lofton v. Potter

Eleventh Circuit

Lofton v. Potter

170 F. App'x 118

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 13, 2006·No. No. 05-14618; D.C. Docket No. 02-03277-CV-JEC-1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have thoroughly reviewed the issues raised in the merits of this case by examining the extensive record, the briefs, and the arguments of counsel contained therein. Under a de novo standard of review, we conclude that the eleven-page district court order by the Honorable Julie E. Carnes, dated July 21, 2005, is thorough, well-reasoned and correct. See Kelliher v. Veneman, 313 F.3d 1270, 1275 (11th Cir. 2002). It is affirmed as to all issues and adopted as the order of this court.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We have thoroughly reviewed the issues raised in the merits of this case by examining the extensive record, the briefs, and the arguments of counsel contained therein. Under a de novo standard of review, we conclude that the eleven-page district court order by the Honorable Julie E. Carnes, dated July 21, 2005, is thorough, well-reasoned and correct. See Kelliher v. Veneman, 313 F.3d 1270, 1275 (11th Cir. 2002). It is affirmed as to all issues and adopted as the order of this court.

AFFIRMED.

Lofton v. Potter, 170 F. App'x 118 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

170 F. App'x 118 (Lofton v. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related