Lofton v. Potter

Eleventh Circuit

Lofton v. Potter

170 F. App'x 118

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedMarch 13, 2006

DocketNo. 05-14618; D.C. Docket No. 02-03277-CV-JEC-1

StatusPublished

This text of 170 F. App'x 118 (Lofton v. Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lofton v. Potter, 170 F. App'x 118 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have thoroughly reviewed the issues raised in the merits of this case by examining the extensive record, the briefs, and the arguments of counsel contained therein. Under a de novo standard of review, we conclude that the eleven-page district court order by the Honorable Julie E. Carnes, dated July 21, 2005, is thorough, well-reasoned and correct. See Kelliher v. Veneman, 313 F.3d 1270, 1275 (11th Cir. 2002). It is affirmed as to all issues and adopted as the order of this court.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We have thoroughly reviewed the issues raised in the merits of this case by examining the extensive record, the briefs, and the arguments of counsel contained therein. Under a de novo standard of review, we conclude that the eleven-page district court order by the Honorable Julie E. Carnes, dated July 21, 2005, is thorough, well-reasoned and correct. See Kelliher v. Veneman, 313 F.3d 1270, 1275 (11th Cir. 2002). It is affirmed as to all issues and adopted as the order of this court.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 F. App'x 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lofton-v-potter-ca11-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack