Lofton v. Page

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lofton v. Page

187 A.D.2d 1012, 593 N.Y.S.2d 476, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14045

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 187 A.D.2d 1012 (Lofton v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lofton v. Page, 187 A.D.2d 1012, 593 N.Y.S.2d 476, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14045 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that Family Court’s order of February 25, 1992 improperly modified his visitation rights. That order did not modify visitation but, rather, denied his petition to modify the court’s prior orders, which had, in fact, modified the terms and conditions of visitation. The petition for a modification was properly denied. The record shows that petitioner failed to establish any ground that would have justified a modification of the prior orders. (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Honan, J. — Visitation.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that Family Court’s order of February 25, 1992 improperly modified his visitation rights. That order did not modify visitation but, rather, denied his petition to modify the court’s prior orders, which had, in fact, modified the terms and conditions of visitation. The petition for a modification was properly denied. The record shows that petitioner failed to establish any ground that would have justified a modification of the prior orders. (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Honan, J. — Visitation.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 A.D.2d 1012, 593 N.Y.S.2d 476, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lofton-v-page-nyappdiv-1992.