Loftin v. State
84 S.E. 833, 16 Ga. App. 195, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 539
Opinion
The Court of Appeals can not consider a bill of exceptions which contains merely a recital of the history of the ease and specifies the parts of the record to be transmitted, but which does not set forth any complaint as to any ruling of the lower court or assign error thereon. Under such circumstances the judgment must be presumed to have been correct. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Loftin v. State, 84 S.E. 833, 16 Ga. App. 195, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 539 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).
84 S.E. 833 (Loftin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Armstrong v. State
128 S.E.2d 350 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
J. L. Todd Auction Co. v. Bryant
124 S.E.2d 295 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)