Loftin v. Crews & Associates, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Loftin v. Crews & Associates, Inc.

771 S.W.2d 16, 299 Ark. 1, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 253

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 22, 1989·No. 89-111·Published

Opinion

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The trial court granted a summary judgment in these consolidated cases. We affirm under Rule 9(d) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals.

Appellant did not abstract the complaints, the answers, the motions for summary judgment, the affidavits, or the order consolidating the two lawsuits and granting summary judgment.

The abstract is flagrantly deficient and, therefore, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The trial court granted a summary judgment in these consolidated cases. We affirm under Rule 9(d) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals.

Appellant did not abstract the complaints, the answers, the motions for summary judgment, the affidavits, or the order consolidating the two lawsuits and granting summary judgment.

The abstract is flagrantly deficient and, therefore, we affirm.

Loftin v. Crews & Associates, Inc., 771 S.W.2d 16, 299 Ark. 1, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 253 (Ark. 1989).

Pincite

771 S.W.2d 16 (Loftin v. Crews & Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.