Loftin v. Crews & Associates, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Loftin v. Crews & Associates, Inc.

771 S.W.2d 16, 299 Ark. 1, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 253

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMay 22, 1989

Docket89-111

StatusPublished

This text of 771 S.W.2d 16 (Loftin v. Crews & Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Loftin v. Crews & Associates, Inc., 771 S.W.2d 16, 299 Ark. 1, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 253 (Ark. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The trial court granted a summary judgment in these consolidated cases. We affirm under Rule 9(d) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals.

Appellant did not abstract the complaints, the answers, the motions for summary judgment, the affidavits, or the order consolidating the two lawsuits and granting summary judgment.

The abstract is flagrantly deficient and, therefore, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The trial court granted a summary judgment in these consolidated cases. We affirm under Rule 9(d) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals.

Appellant did not abstract the complaints, the answers, the motions for summary judgment, the affidavits, or the order consolidating the two lawsuits and granting summary judgment.

The abstract is flagrantly deficient and, therefore, we affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

771 S.W.2d 16, 299 Ark. 1, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loftin-v-crews-associates-inc-ark-1989.