Lofthouse v. Dalto

254 A.D. 578, 3 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6625

Opinion

Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint for lack of prosecution, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur. [See ante, p. 575.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lofthouse v. Dalto, 254 A.D. 578, 3 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6625 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

254 A.D. 578 (Lofthouse v. Dalto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.