Loften v. Johnson
This text of Loften v. Johnson (Loften v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-11363 Conference Calendar
JAMES ERIC LOFTEN,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,
Respondent-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:00-CV-233-C -------------------- April 11, 2001
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
James Eric Loften, Texas prisoner # 616132, seeks a
certificate of appealability (“COA”) to appeal the district
court’s partial dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus
petition. This court must raise the issue of its appellate
jurisdiction sua sponte. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th
Cir. 1987). Because the district court’s order adjudicated fewer
than all of Loften’s claims, this court lacks jurisdiction to
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-11363 -2-
consider it. See Thompson v. Betts, 754 F.2d 1243, 1245 (5th
Cir. 1985); 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of
jurisdiction. Loften’s request for a COA is DENIED.
APPEAL DISMISSED; COA DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Loften v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loften-v-johnson-ca5-2001.