' - ' 025/5500 £,HML§& /\/O 03 /53, 757 RECEIVED¢N
COURT OF CH|M!NAL APPEALS
§§/h€§ § §0€ C 0\2>§2€00 ~ 05518 2015 v `/S _ AbegACOSta,'ClOfk
/\;50007€~7/ 02`0//\/77 070/021(.2 0237/
505/050 502 005/550 253 7522/2302237/ 3573020 22 320 000/2252// 02 655/07
§212100003 32000€§ 73/{ /\1)770/ /0000/0§ 720/§ C 037 7 621/700 \40 05 07550’5550 057552/7 305075,557 005/5 /0 /0502»2/,~ 02 §§`020'0302/ 202 /50752:5052/ 505// 020/5 205 250 525/555 03 25 7 2502/507 552/200 0>5/5 07 757/ 053/2522 352/07?<55225 ' ' §51§205053 000 03 7225§7 050/70 //23~ 0/§ 702/27 072/2730 2727
020,05/ 0055007, 007)/ ,//55000/20/52/75 2052
0 057`/ 57 /§77//505€’0` 503 §3.-//57/3 577/502 2050/722 200/55 015/555 202/0 / 252 /5055 5//2/0
70 251 (3, §§ 720 723 ’32€_*07 002\5)0/7§ 3005/7 7 /53,20/0
Q/d/!/F/// /7/ 39 3021/2112 /L%F/\/ €7//7_//10/\/037< 2U/0<§ /‘37\7/ I/(@r\/c/€
770 372/00 07 /"/`021_, 200(`700/7/ 1 00 /7/03// /53, o?5/51 7201/0
2 550/200 306/05 A 20 2 0512
000 77 5 7703/01077/ 572/2302 230/50 70 222/07 002/§ 520/057
552/003/52\<2 '/5 036 [00//7, 729/23[‘/02/2// 20212§7>0/03 .'75§
555 5 , - 507 2257 7'520 50 25 555/0 205/5 7207 .
§ 005705 4 @.02 350§50/ 7023 0 050/ 775/377 752/22 20037 //2>7
021/28 705 020/50 00/5; 05 2 /0705< 2702 025/5 57 7.$@5/5', /2/55 // 022§ 3500 323/222 /7 5752//5/ 230 757 .
0 575 5003
/032 757
,€/)500/00 007573
7 357 232/03 3220/3001 750/353 7)3§ § 1>\~) :)5
g §
h .`
1*' ., .. US¢ \Y.\ 11 J',"¢>'('.F*::,~»““,
,'F*¢ ).~ h
Linarty &numty audio ar`!ml'
, . ,'._,.... l.:\ I § v`*§
l ~Com§§ nqm, petitioner f11@§ s§id*nrd§r under;'
cump1y with;cbdn;nf crim. proc. Art.11.07, nut of malice conspiracy,under Rackateer Influenced end Corrupt Drganizetion Act,18 u. a. c. §§ 1961-19680
1n violatmon of wire Fraud, Mail Fraud,18 u. 9. c. § 13b3, through, h2 u.e.c. §§ 1961-1932, 42 u. a. c § 1965(2)(3) 42 u. 9. c. § 1986 with and through TDCJ~ ID Prison mail ayatem,
Petition§r ,nn MayUG, 2015,plnced Art. 11 87 writ of habeas corpus For' No.18, 957 ,eaaking ralie? ?rom a unlaw?ul conviction Nov 21, 2013, at 75th Dietuicw.caurt,by Jury tuial,by Judge Mure?ield,in an unlawful enhancement nf~cr ZBBSB,patitionar_ie innocence of both cr ZBBSB}and nn.1B,957,MayQ€,2015 am,within 1 year of discovering the 'new evidence, withh§ld from April 18,2012{int11 May06, 201h pm, Petitioner placed my ART.11}B7,FOR`thé!fabricated,by fraud,falsa avidenca,used in the
,K{§ enhancement tnaai dr Nn.16,957 AT 75th caurt ,Novizi`zd13;£§§i§;gggz_
§§g §§§§3§§§_§2_§§§,_££11114_] form, 18 pages to the form filed May06,2015am,», 452 WE§H§§_§Q:§§_M§B_$hB Exhibi§g githhglg,by the stagg g? T§gaa,and mg '
Trial attagn§y, Jed Silva ,and THE Appeal attorney, Alvin N §§§Bz§ who was appo1ntad by the state of Texae. More?ield when he and Jed
Silverman ,conapired, and Morefiald, let 3.511verman,g§t off my appeal, petitioner paid him $27, 000 to appaal. Petitinn§r presented a significance show of convincing actual innocence claim ,NeyDG, 2015 within the Art.11. 07, placed in prison mail system on MayB§, 2015, each nxhibit's A, 8, AND D, PAGES,17-1B, told th§ cnurt, what the éxhibit whnra, and how they show my actual,innocanca, and how petitioner-was set up by tha atate_oF‘Texa§ bnth hprii`1B,2012`B:30 pm when petitioner`was nat inside Yhé St§ta of Texée,and at Buyd haéing, L.L¢C.Caeino§fnom‘?pm anvil 19,2012;1nt11 etter S:Qm,nod Apc11'19;20t2 making it impoaaibla,:Fbrnhiberty city pdlica, to set up a nontzol buy
1 et 2h129rnnd evé Libarty,Tx??§?§ that a (cl) gave petitioner mark EUV
w Hnney at 2612 grand av§ liberty,fx,and that petitioner gave thls (ci)
crack cnaaine, the fabricated Acrent warrant ,§1gnad et BsSme nn 6/18/2012,
/z)FQ
/27
§
VWWMMJ
_Q§:. 2
19 272 /:-'
M!
,/
jn
.g;j%zé/ j%§:?AD);)
\
It would have been lmpoeaibe, far Liberty c1ty poltca,?a1rnh11d,B.Millar, E favluc 10 have obeanvad that,or imposelbla under the laws d? nature for vthat occurrence to have taken place at 211 Unlt¢d~$ta%so~%»&aahw$£Z F.Sd 937,942 n.1, unixadm$&a%eawvvhckan2181163 F. 2d 602 605, No time stated w1th- W in the fabricated Afndavit dated Aprs,;. 13, 2_012, sigan at va zopm,,.~uer,e.asa. i""‘ N131212 263…a1m 2dw833 -3&, StatameMoLavnq316%921133 180,183(2010) IN THIS CASE, theoa~w&swna“mdate 21»1112, uhenm1hawcnn1va1 buy»aupp012~1n~hava~ ~heppen~,tha nnly~da1eqia~AgdewQ&héMH£ §h@”nnly, ima”$ewa»*&¢Bnpmwwhen c s aignad thiaw$adr&cated .Arreaxwmsnsan£, aearch»uarrant 51nce*3pm~£px11118, 3212 Paxixigngr hadwqggnmoux~o£%xhe§xa$@ 01 l§a&mm§nd athOMDMRmG&ngWL¢L~C. A$HV&“¢unqLA, AMB~HDURMdLLMaMfaommaabsn$¥wj;,There?orl ,Patitian§x¢could
M._.`».._,...~
no$-…have~been in¢…pcaaaseion an/'I v drugs,NQ;Mdi¢mthe¥mhau~wp;obabla*&@uae A1111»4212912,n0rngMmiha#wamcu1e tha$”§&immmmpana,whén PQ§;§;QBB£*LH$M$M vaca»¢o~m@%aa,inmhich.22211221~2¥»3;¢2622 16 2222222222211212¢222121222cg 7 2012/2212 wm 1 1”2‘,.,21:,...,`22212¢., m h 122 .,921:`.2221125..92@.2.,m.c,)&,.;;pwl@mé;;;;.o n~ ¢./`19/ 2012, 22222132»212221150222Carmier at;Amee,Tx,1hgy*g§g“nugpcnuthe,n$@§$. w-@wp~. s ea:ch.-. ms . t.ha...,§;:m;._k' 21;_329.221§.1;291;.12221.1,>¢ \» the v had ;2.21.121911§3912 cen§@%ta rsmdva»¢hemmlahue 32221§22111221122112213112nzglgmgxgpgwggggLibegty Tx on Aprll 19, 2012, ` "`
Patit£oner filed my ART .11.07 MAVDG, 2015hhanaama»mh€oll&a&h$d&~u 3.390,
d 101-405,1136.61.853.1222 L Ed. 2d203(1993),MMXEAM"EMRanalngIUG 5.61,2339,` aaa 28 u a.e. §Zzba(d),pst1tlonerwd1acnx2$ad nammav1d@num Wnaggj 2n1h,and
¢filad my 221111162~nn 22206»2115 am ,mheqa the ongoing conseracy 12 21111 active, where the ataté of Texas,ordered THBJ~ 10 to steal delay my aut- going mail to all courts,
IN t2ia case,tt»todk L1varty cnanxy”£$mdag§wto 1112 mgm Artt.11 gl£lt 32
my§ MAT? belief, from M8y06, 201Bam,up to duly 30, 2015 .my Art.11. 07
with hetéachad pagna,and axh1b1ts has bean ramaved ,éhangad, the state court out 29 malxca,wtth1n 15 days~$§days,fa£lgd to respond to the AR1~11.G7, bur ,out of ma1lca,thay refuaad to attached tha ART,11.07 10 the ratutn, are wa1ver o? Nnthe,Patitionee have not racievad by carti?1ed mall
the Application¢p§ék-?rom Libarty county,on Aug05,2015,pet1tioner got a states waiver o? notica,it was not by csrti$1ed_mail,my Art,11.07 mae
not attachad,tha patit1un f1led Hay06,2015 am,Tha notice has ND.CR 18,957- A,I¥ should hnt_ba aaaignad the Lsttar; Al ANB IT BHDULb`NUT pa filed 253rd court,lt ahodld be 7Eth court,cnnviction of 99 years,Pat1tioner 7raquast a contempt of court,ahd a Default audgment,Fed.R.Biv.Prao.HS(a)(b)
(2),aeeaanaa~#~50¢k,§4§_U.8.199,212-213,221~2&,127 $.61.910(2097)1ha court said that the lower courts should nut interpret the PLAR exhaustion
requirements to depart from the usual practice under the \Fed.R.Giv.Proc.
2;`4L3, ,-r v _2®?@
{
'énw€bntempt judgments are p§¥%`“? YEE“d§uaI”IIY1§Ekion pkao€fc§
D/>£M/M?/#$ /;§’1’ 957
L;/ ,/L)M §§ /D:£QD£§/f?f§ , 3 z:) 749 /°
02 accepted litlgation practice, except to €FE“§?Y”Ht“th§t th§ PLAR ac U'lly éay§ to do §o. Accord MYIl€Y"VTbBWETHTE%1 73d 1091 1099(200):3"¥H*UE?§_°"
un or rule s§jTE Feata?tfv'.Pruc- and §r§?“aa§§‘§§€*§§§€r?r€§lly”“§wfran usf ole
'judg§m§n%§j the court oan“§tilt"gr§nf”€$§ ?he PL#RWUQ§§”HB£` a??édt the
court§w EEHEEHhtwpnwaTTSee Ea§§x County dell Inm§ta§ v. Traff1ngar, 18 F. Supp.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
' - ' 025/5500 £,HML§& /\/O 03 /53, 757 RECEIVED¢N
COURT OF CH|M!NAL APPEALS
§§/h€§ § §0€ C 0\2>§2€00 ~ 05518 2015 v `/S _ AbegACOSta,'ClOfk
/\;50007€~7/ 02`0//\/77 070/021(.2 0237/
505/050 502 005/550 253 7522/2302237/ 3573020 22 320 000/2252// 02 655/07
§212100003 32000€§ 73/{ /\1)770/ /0000/0§ 720/§ C 037 7 621/700 \40 05 07550’5550 057552/7 305075,557 005/5 /0 /0502»2/,~ 02 §§`020'0302/ 202 /50752:5052/ 505// 020/5 205 250 525/555 03 25 7 2502/507 552/200 0>5/5 07 757/ 053/2522 352/07?<55225 ' ' §51§205053 000 03 7225§7 050/70 //23~ 0/§ 702/27 072/2730 2727
020,05/ 0055007, 007)/ ,//55000/20/52/75 2052
0 057`/ 57 /§77//505€’0` 503 §3.-//57/3 577/502 2050/722 200/55 015/555 202/0 / 252 /5055 5//2/0
70 251 (3, §§ 720 723 ’32€_*07 002\5)0/7§ 3005/7 7 /53,20/0
Q/d/!/F/// /7/ 39 3021/2112 /L%F/\/ €7//7_//10/\/037< 2U/0<§ /‘37\7/ I/(@r\/c/€
770 372/00 07 /"/`021_, 200(`700/7/ 1 00 /7/03// /53, o?5/51 7201/0
2 550/200 306/05 A 20 2 0512
000 77 5 7703/01077/ 572/2302 230/50 70 222/07 002/§ 520/057
552/003/52\<2 '/5 036 [00//7, 729/23[‘/02/2// 20212§7>0/03 .'75§
555 5 , - 507 2257 7'520 50 25 555/0 205/5 7207 .
§ 005705 4 @.02 350§50/ 7023 0 050/ 775/377 752/22 20037 //2>7
021/28 705 020/50 00/5; 05 2 /0705< 2702 025/5 57 7.$@5/5', /2/55 // 022§ 3500 323/222 /7 5752//5/ 230 757 .
0 575 5003
/032 757
,€/)500/00 007573
7 357 232/03 3220/3001 750/353 7)3§ § 1>\~) :)5
g §
h .`
1*' ., .. US¢ \Y.\ 11 J',"¢>'('.F*::,~»““,
,'F*¢ ).~ h
Linarty &numty audio ar`!ml'
, . ,'._,.... l.:\ I § v`*§
l ~Com§§ nqm, petitioner f11@§ s§id*nrd§r under;'
cump1y with;cbdn;nf crim. proc. Art.11.07, nut of malice conspiracy,under Rackateer Influenced end Corrupt Drganizetion Act,18 u. a. c. §§ 1961-19680
1n violatmon of wire Fraud, Mail Fraud,18 u. 9. c. § 13b3, through, h2 u.e.c. §§ 1961-1932, 42 u. a. c § 1965(2)(3) 42 u. 9. c. § 1986 with and through TDCJ~ ID Prison mail ayatem,
Petition§r ,nn MayUG, 2015,plnced Art. 11 87 writ of habeas corpus For' No.18, 957 ,eaaking ralie? ?rom a unlaw?ul conviction Nov 21, 2013, at 75th Dietuicw.caurt,by Jury tuial,by Judge Mure?ield,in an unlawful enhancement nf~cr ZBBSB,patitionar_ie innocence of both cr ZBBSB}and nn.1B,957,MayQ€,2015 am,within 1 year of discovering the 'new evidence, withh§ld from April 18,2012{int11 May06, 201h pm, Petitioner placed my ART.11}B7,FOR`thé!fabricated,by fraud,falsa avidenca,used in the
,K{§ enhancement tnaai dr Nn.16,957 AT 75th caurt ,Novizi`zd13;£§§i§;gggz_
§§g §§§§3§§§_§2_§§§,_££11114_] form, 18 pages to the form filed May06,2015am,», 452 WE§H§§_§Q:§§_M§B_$hB Exhibi§g githhglg,by the stagg g? T§gaa,and mg '
Trial attagn§y, Jed Silva ,and THE Appeal attorney, Alvin N §§§Bz§ who was appo1ntad by the state of Texae. More?ield when he and Jed
Silverman ,conapired, and Morefiald, let 3.511verman,g§t off my appeal, petitioner paid him $27, 000 to appaal. Petitinn§r presented a significance show of convincing actual innocence claim ,NeyDG, 2015 within the Art.11. 07, placed in prison mail system on MayB§, 2015, each nxhibit's A, 8, AND D, PAGES,17-1B, told th§ cnurt, what the éxhibit whnra, and how they show my actual,innocanca, and how petitioner-was set up by tha atate_oF‘Texa§ bnth hprii`1B,2012`B:30 pm when petitioner`was nat inside Yhé St§ta of Texée,and at Buyd haéing, L.L¢C.Caeino§fnom‘?pm anvil 19,2012;1nt11 etter S:Qm,nod Apc11'19;20t2 making it impoaaibla,:Fbrnhiberty city pdlica, to set up a nontzol buy
1 et 2h129rnnd evé Libarty,Tx??§?§ that a (cl) gave petitioner mark EUV
w Hnney at 2612 grand av§ liberty,fx,and that petitioner gave thls (ci)
crack cnaaine, the fabricated Acrent warrant ,§1gnad et BsSme nn 6/18/2012,
/z)FQ
/27
§
VWWMMJ
_Q§:. 2
19 272 /:-'
M!
,/
jn
.g;j%zé/ j%§:?AD);)
\
It would have been lmpoeaibe, far Liberty c1ty poltca,?a1rnh11d,B.Millar, E favluc 10 have obeanvad that,or imposelbla under the laws d? nature for vthat occurrence to have taken place at 211 Unlt¢d~$ta%so~%»&aahw$£Z F.Sd 937,942 n.1, unixadm$&a%eawvvhckan2181163 F. 2d 602 605, No time stated w1th- W in the fabricated Afndavit dated Aprs,;. 13, 2_012, sigan at va zopm,,.~uer,e.asa. i""‘ N131212 263…a1m 2dw833 -3&, StatameMoLavnq316%921133 180,183(2010) IN THIS CASE, theoa~w&swna“mdate 21»1112, uhenm1hawcnn1va1 buy»aupp012~1n~hava~ ~heppen~,tha nnly~da1eqia~AgdewQ&héMH£ §h@”nnly, ima”$ewa»*&¢Bnpmwwhen c s aignad thiaw$adr&cated .Arreaxwmsnsan£, aearch»uarrant 51nce*3pm~£px11118, 3212 Paxixigngr hadwqggnmoux~o£%xhe§xa$@ 01 l§a&mm§nd athOMDMRmG&ngWL¢L~C. A$HV&“¢unqLA, AMB~HDURMdLLMaMfaommaabsn$¥wj;,There?orl ,Patitian§x¢could
M._.`».._,...~
no$-…have~been in¢…pcaaaseion an/'I v drugs,NQ;Mdi¢mthe¥mhau~wp;obabla*&@uae A1111»4212912,n0rngMmiha#wamcu1e tha$”§&immmmpana,whén PQ§;§;QBB£*LH$M$M vaca»¢o~m@%aa,inmhich.22211221~2¥»3;¢2622 16 2222222222211212¢222121222cg 7 2012/2212 wm 1 1”2‘,.,21:,...,`22212¢., m h 122 .,921:`.2221125..92@.2.,m.c,)&,.;;pwl@mé;;;;.o n~ ¢./`19/ 2012, 22222132»212221150222Carmier at;Amee,Tx,1hgy*g§g“nugpcnuthe,n$@§$. w-@wp~. s ea:ch.-. ms . t.ha...,§;:m;._k' 21;_329.221§.1;291;.12221.1,>¢ \» the v had ;2.21.121911§3912 cen§@%ta rsmdva»¢hemmlahue 32221§22111221122112213112nzglgmgxgpgwggggLibegty Tx on Aprll 19, 2012, ` "`
Patit£oner filed my ART .11.07 MAVDG, 2015hhanaama»mh€oll&a&h$d&~u 3.390,
d 101-405,1136.61.853.1222 L Ed. 2d203(1993),MMXEAM"EMRanalngIUG 5.61,2339,` aaa 28 u a.e. §Zzba(d),pst1tlonerwd1acnx2$ad nammav1d@num Wnaggj 2n1h,and
¢filad my 221111162~nn 22206»2115 am ,mheqa the ongoing conseracy 12 21111 active, where the ataté of Texas,ordered THBJ~ 10 to steal delay my aut- going mail to all courts,
IN t2ia case,tt»todk L1varty cnanxy”£$mdag§wto 1112 mgm Artt.11 gl£lt 32
my§ MAT? belief, from M8y06, 201Bam,up to duly 30, 2015 .my Art.11. 07
with hetéachad pagna,and axh1b1ts has bean ramaved ,éhangad, the state court out 29 malxca,wtth1n 15 days~$§days,fa£lgd to respond to the AR1~11.G7, bur ,out of ma1lca,thay refuaad to attached tha ART,11.07 10 the ratutn, are wa1ver o? Nnthe,Patitionee have not racievad by carti?1ed mall
the Application¢p§ék-?rom Libarty county,on Aug05,2015,pet1tioner got a states waiver o? notica,it was not by csrti$1ed_mail,my Art,11.07 mae
not attachad,tha patit1un f1led Hay06,2015 am,Tha notice has ND.CR 18,957- A,I¥ should hnt_ba aaaignad the Lsttar; Al ANB IT BHDULb`NUT pa filed 253rd court,lt ahodld be 7Eth court,cnnviction of 99 years,Pat1tioner 7raquast a contempt of court,ahd a Default audgment,Fed.R.Biv.Prao.HS(a)(b)
(2),aeeaanaa~#~50¢k,§4§_U.8.199,212-213,221~2&,127 $.61.910(2097)1ha court said that the lower courts should nut interpret the PLAR exhaustion
requirements to depart from the usual practice under the \Fed.R.Giv.Proc.
2;`4L3, ,-r v _2®?@
{
'énw€bntempt judgments are p§¥%`“? YEE“d§uaI”IIY1§Ekion pkao€fc§
D/>£M/M?/#$ /;§’1’ 957
L;/ ,/L)M §§ /D:£QD£§/f?f§ , 3 z:) 749 /°
02 accepted litlgation practice, except to €FE“§?Y”Ht“th§t th§ PLAR ac U'lly éay§ to do §o. Accord MYIl€Y"VTbBWETHTE%1 73d 1091 1099(200):3"¥H*UE?§_°"
un or rule s§jTE Feata?tfv'.Pruc- and §r§?“aa§§‘§§€*§§§€r?r€§lly”“§wfran usf ole
'judg§m§n%§j the court oan“§tilt"gr§nf”€$§ ?he PL#RWUQ§§”HB£` a??édt the
court§w EEHEEHhtwpnwaTTSee Ea§§x County dell Inm§ta§ v. Traff1ngar, 18 F. Supp. 2d hh§ ,h$Z,s§e~R1vK§TEUTMTBd E¥W§TV"HTK§;in tgla Caa§, pe¥ltion§¥”?§ `at”up,out“o€*m§lfh§,mh§n@pet&vroner~w§§”hdf”fE”¥h§”S¥§t§ o? T§%B§§inca 7pm“aWFIrWT&TZUTZTUDMXE”B?§BZnum*%nt11”1972912;Petitioner €EYETT§EE“§FF u$?»19*mdnth§”§§?&¥€"¥§¥§l,mhioh afért§v“NEV”TUT?UTB\cunvttf§@“W€Ww?¥T?UT§§ N§m»ev&d§nc§”dt§c§v§r§v”durntng“th§*§pp§§r?NUTUBTT§:UUFWS>cr“ZBUBFTIIFEEB to no 42»€5??§§§»Ha%%and~va&or&dav&&B u. 9.130 S.Ct`.25“9,177L. ad 2d 130 (2010), the M§tat§~ F”T§x§§"knum*w§?f¥fdn§fmm€§”twn§b§n€€?and thax»p§xixinn§x~» mae 13£5cx,nn$wat~ahlz~o£££!m£xa§Libac$y,lx,T§§lwknwu¢dnap¢uuLJuLJ¢uuNL» §g§cohmma;r§nt, John§un v.$t§;§¢£g§“g¢gmggmz?Z, ev§n, if they could prove they did a control buy before petitioner left T§xaa on April 18, 2012@$h§y~ hggwgg legal search merr§nt, to enter 2612 nrand agg*Lihggxy, IX+mLIH§N~¢H& 3-BPMHUUR gm gog;;;lg&gglg~,C;Lg§xmx*&$g$o¢§§£ e.m. 3d 70h~707(2011) see §ohmidt V. Stat ng»gg 620, 621 Thg"”y1dannawamam¢Ln§“gig;§_g£wlax§o, made g~#gg;gm!ql¢;};~§;;~entoy, Ig,g§*daaa*&§~£w§d“ll§§»in.violation of patit£oHén bthl§$h¢l$£¢§ U. S. nggy. within §§gw;gm;&&mwdg££¢mithag&ws§nuning th§%££émg“pc§ga,uithau§ § gggraot, ~ §§g§g&~h&§£“;§&§z¢which oggition§ghgg§“gg;mg$»Z§lZ”gnam§,a § Lih§c¢g»lx~ and since 733“£2;11“1£*£§13,up 1a S;am,now Aorilr19.2012,9§§;313“£“3§~§£~* Boyd Raoing,L.L.C.CAEIND,en when the fabricated ,by fraud, warrant §a§ §nppo§e to bo sign§d,at *&5§§£9_AP£L&¢&£§£BLZ,ngLiLian£@nnr thev;g§§£§w* Tghwg§,wm§o;“§£“_aalzwg;: =..a nd , ng§MuM$Mp§LL P_:erg;§t.;.oo.e.ma..m.n.§$_§.nsmhen petitioner returned back,mh§ghm$ha#~gg;“mxmg£g§g g §§m£$§$e~nun»£azhsm~n§¢~
§ dr.vi§itz§t dr.Dork for April,19,20]g 89;§m,wh1annBBLA$AARQRMHEAHin$an¢§d
to stay intzl the §§§kend endad,§§hlugv.n§;o,u.s.298“1115§1£:1§§111295); nqué v,ae;x,sh? u.a.s1atlza s,cc§zosa,<2005)p§§111§§oaoo§q§§§§w§@gnnz§mp&, of court, not only 15 this affidavit daggew£g£;l~l§*gglzdnggggMg$“§$§£~i£”m ?raud,§ach p§ragraph'§#$, #h, #5,#6“m§d§ with a reckless diq£gggzgg”jggm$h§ truth, the (ci) 13 F§br;catag,fr§ud it was a conqgwggggd;o 1§§¥§“$33”14§§ ogiwg:§§§nw theW crack cocq;gg"purcham§ happen ,2 ma ne g§¢gg§gch ago seizure §N§mzm£l”£t 375~ 76(hth §d. M“201'1!»), Unit§d Spg$§§ v aBg§ton,ES$ F.Zd j§y -519,32#~25,P§t1tionac not arrested st S:Sme,h/1B/2012,not inside 7exaa, ix nor 2612 grand eve ,Lib§rty,Tx,nor the tunck, along 7pm,mas at Boyd~ aaaing,L.L.c.Ar urwrnw,LA,waxL april 19,2012,5:§§3¢vere is a over s
3BAp3hsfnce- 8a1n_aignad3a$__&¢MHN»JHHHA»45¢284€Pbut~pettttun€f°nut“fh _Lexes 7515$3-¥48&¢99%%, 788 e. w. 26 5723MaLe-v~tuutefena~399 u. e.30, 98 S. Bt. 1969, 26 L. Ed. 26 189(1970) 77 ' 376 u. § 483, 8b e. ct.BBS( 1961)"§ _ , v u. 3.129 s.ct.171o,173 L. zd. 2d aas(zons), if they
1619 month later,cla1m they had en Arreet werrant,petit1oner erreeted, the
- next date, after petitioner returned beck to Texea, arrested et FM 168 6
80r1mer st. Amee,Tx,ou&etde-$he-$euck, the§-had-ne-reeeon_to*§§*TEH“THe
k ,=_,:_l;.gg,k., tw,.Z~p\mW>eeerde-Fromsshmrn&~dw§e»~?ound ,-no~mer\r*' Y" l52113313333_3131833333333t~nnamlea351333333-+9-20+2, vhey~hau-nu-rtgnr~ro
§;; _take petitioner (hngll£a~hesk_to~LLhentyT4*7%e-2b12_grand-e¥eetébemdqr,
.`~‘. tx,tnggg,unln3333333.3133333333t, nn333333~3+-cu3tudv-¢on¢~he+ure~rerrchiid
1353 g§§_;nalde_$zusk,dsiue into,_g§ide_¥ard*ne»ehetnfu?~cue¢edy ~done-at~_ _§g;miar_at&£meevix beefere_takan.te_zh$z-grand7
»pc§ aug xhe§e y3dnn33A331131333o121313a33opm33binh~i ,ps$&$ienas3nox~ine§de~¥exee¢end_ainsa,_¥pM~Ape%4-4BTZD42, up~io_Ape&4-49-,
"53; .2n12,513333¢3u133333333,3§_novo 33133333833¢133333;_3¢333 :§j getitlonggdgrreex~£oc.peeeeeeion on A911131832842, uhlch~ie~£alae,petitloner, 7 §§ . cen't be in two place at one t1me¢£aaai§m“M35$s$sll£3s»m~2d3555,590,_7
amendment violation, by malioe, then denied petitioner gg;g”f;giijiggg, ~33newterene~3e¢3¢n, union 33313333333~3333331m33~epm»hpm1_Llann12vann_gg_ -87%8pm74%48%2942 when petitioner m ` ' 7 - v to~Ap3113¢912842‘5:am nowhthe~nex$~dey Thia iam’
ea 1n7shrée¢ephez~¥Tkerbery*536 u. e. 603 b1h, 616 N.13,122 5 Ct. 2479(2082) They kneu they could unlam?ully convict petitioner,eend to TbBJ- -ID,7
UHERE petitioner'e outgoing mail stolen ,deleyed7promoted by the state and federal, court of cr1m1nenal appeals court,at Auetin ,Tx7They 1n an onging
\\ oonep1recy,to obstruct juet1ce, to impede, ao 8oyd Racing,L. L. 8. 8ASIND7
7£? _7UILL destroy the security camera footage for April 187 2812, up to Aprll 197 \2812, 5:7am 7 _ _ - ` 173.Loften,declere,etate,verify under penelty of perjur y,that the above
7 77 affidavit in order fora a contempt end de?ault judgement,be entered
f";:§gainet the Stata of Texae ,Liberty Bounty audiclary, attorney LUGAN PICKET¥,
3 warren, M. Poeton, 5. 8. Teylor, in No 187 957 conviction at 7Sth district
court in Liberty,Tx linked to or 29858,nov 2172013,§81.11.87 FILED meyOE,
. k;: 2815 am,petitioner is 107 sound mind,capable of mak1ng this effidavit,an above the age of 21 year of age,
Petitioner7declare,the above placed in prison mail,on this 18th day of
',VD?`/z».
Aug 2015 am,addraoa to Bdth: ' supreme cdurt BuIanNs,201 meat 14th at,nm 106,Aus?1n,zx 78701;and Danna G.Brnun,1923 sam houston{Rm 115 Libartyjfzf]?$?§
Déte Aug 06,2015 am
notice 1 Patitioner gives this court duatlce Sharon Kellar,L.E.Meyeré,€.§ohnaon, M.Keaaler,§.P.Harvay,£.Alcala,B.Richaadson, K;P.Vaary,D.Newall.on duly 21, 2015,mr Abal Acosta,nut of malica,rvturnéd my amended petition to ND. 18,957,MITHBUT RETURNING my envelope,mith the stamps i provided ?ar pustage,my petiton,hrt.11.07 usa raturnad in arrur, IF this cour%,dq not return,my postaga,an my Amandad petition can§e conaidarad 1 am going to sua this court,i did nut waste my elma,$tanpae;paper ¥nr _ nothing,my Art.11.D7 was filed MAY06,2015AM, to tha district clek,they refuse to Fila it,my amended complaint,uaa filed to this court,i am within the rulea, ’ l I, Alao give notice,my ART.11.UB FILED AprilD1,2015 am no reapun@a from district cuurt, Thie court has b@en place on notice once mora,my mail is being tampered with~
00111/131/1/7 '9/ 7 _/1,7)3 1777 /7/17 771/7 1719 / 011/o 39015', /)011" 1113)1/1// 7/59 11}91§/ / 971/11/1/11// 121/117 k_)1/19>771`:'1":1 1971)7 (1'>.1)1/“7)*113\/7 707 17 1177/771 13?1>/‘) 170 `
791151111 13 33 1373 3 7.11113`7 ""“ '
771/§ 1513/11 311/77/ /17‘/1 11 1223 7713""111//3 111/117 701/311 /
77777{/\ /;7/v0//77'1427 /7€13~/147§\ 5 “%F;§7 3 3 37/(77§71 7?7~///1117 79 3 1777/17 713 1337/7 /3/',,,1 /7¢ /@M,j\\j 1477 /\/3/976 /1/ 71 13 111 /31)/////213 1330/330 /613213
7}»11 7/7111’137’7>/7 331/1 //:`1 L/?/OAV‘{/;TXJ /7_;13/1:5' 771 11‘;" fi\l?/* 3::>7 7,:\:>7771773/17/777>/\1fmhj?)€/ 7/3.1§;'15 {71 /L/ )37131 375/y /7///>///\/ /X 737§7’/7 759 /79""‘@5
}`"//,3¢;37 :’-’): /1'3.1§`<’5/53“5'/11110“1)}*4@;)0121'<)0\/77/9, /59, 757 `
51)/*'1;,