Lofland v. Orten

Superior Court of Delaware

Lofland v. Orten

9 Del. 622

DecidedJuly 1, 1874

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Del. 622 (Lofland v. Orten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lofland v. Orten, 9 Del. 622 (Del. Ct. App. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court,

Gilpin, C. J.,

charged the jury, that the justification pleaded under the act of 1861, was a good and complete defence to the action, as it had been proved that the defendants had opened it as town commissioners pursuant to the general powers conferred upon them as such by their charter in relation to the streets of the town ; and they had a perfect right to do so without assessing or awarding any damages to the plaintiff, within the limits of the public road laid out under the act of 1861, and afterward duly approved and confirmed on review, by the Court of General Sessions of the Peace, and established as such.

The defendants had a verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court,

Gilpin, C. J.,

charged the jury, that the justification pleaded under the act of 1861, was a good and complete defence to the action, as it had been proved that the defendants had opened it as town commissioners pursuant to the general powers conferred upon them as such by their charter in relation to the streets of the town ; and they had a perfect right to do so without assessing or awarding any damages to the plaintiff, within the limits of the public road laid out under the act of 1861, and afterward duly approved and confirmed on review, by the Court of General Sessions of the Peace, and established as such.

The defendants had a verdict.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Del. 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lofland-v-orten-delsuperct-1874.