Loffini v. Bellitteri
This text of 250 A.D. 855 (Loffini v. Bellitteri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action involving a labor dispute, for an injunction restraining respondents from violating the provisions of an agreement in writing entered into between appellant and respondents, and for other relief, judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of the plaintiff’s proofs, but not on the merits, affirmed, with [856]*856costs. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial upon the ground that the action is for specific performance and that section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act is irrelevant thereto.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 A.D. 855, 296 N.Y.S. 826, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loffini-v-bellitteri-nyappdiv-1937.