Loew's, Inc. v. United States

340 U.S. 803

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Loew's, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 339 U.S. 974 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 9, 1950·No. No. 844; No. 845; No. 846; No. 847·Published

Opinion

The order of this Court entered in these cases on June 5, 1950, is amended to read as follows:

“Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed. Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Burton are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the cases set down for argument. Mr. Justice Jackson and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.”

[The order is reported as amended in the bound volume of 339 U. S. at p. 974.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The order of this Court entered in these cases on June 5, 1950, is amended to read as follows:

“Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed. Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Burton are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the cases set down for argument. Mr. Justice Jackson and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.”

[The order is reported as amended in the bound volume of 339 U. S. at p. 974.]

Loew's, Inc. v. United States, 340 U.S. 803 (1950).

Pincite

340 U.S. 803 (Loew's, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.