Loewenthal v. Globe & Rutgers Insurance

132 A.D. 890, 116 N.Y.S. 454

This text of 132 A.D. 890 (Loewenthal v. Globe & Rutgers Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loewenthal v. Globe & Rutgers Insurance, 132 A.D. 890, 116 N.Y.S. 454 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

Rich, J.:

This court held in Spencer v. Fort Orange Paper Co. (74 App. Div. 74) that “the granting or withholding of a bill of particulars is. within the disf cretion of the court, and where there has been no abuse of this discretion the appellate courts will not, as a rule, interfere.” This principle has been universally adopted by the appellate courts of this State. The record in the case at bar presents no abuse of discretion, and the order must be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor and Burr, JJ., concurred. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spencer v. Fort Orange Paper Co.
74 A.D. 74 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 A.D. 890, 116 N.Y.S. 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loewenthal-v-globe-rutgers-insurance-nyappdiv-1909.