Loewenherz v. McMurria

142 S.E. 902, 38 Ga. App. 94, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 59
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 10, 1928
Docket18703
StatusPublished

This text of 142 S.E. 902 (Loewenherz v. McMurria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loewenherz v. McMurria, 142 S.E. 902, 38 Ga. App. 94, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 59 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

This was a suit in trover for the recovery of an automobile. Upon tlie trial the evidence demanded a finding that the plaintiff had neither tide to the automobile nor the right to possess it. The assignments of error upon various rulings of the court as to the admissibility [95]*95of evidence show no material error, and the court properly directed a verdict in favor of the defendants.

Decided April 10, 1928. McGutchen, Bowden & Gaggstatter, for plaintiff. George G. Palmer, for defendants.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and. Bloodworlh, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 S.E. 902, 38 Ga. App. 94, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loewenherz-v-mcmurria-gactapp-1928.