Loew v. North British & Mercantile Ins.

156 N.Y.S. 692
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 7, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 156 N.Y.S. 692 (Loew v. North British & Mercantile Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loew v. North British & Mercantile Ins., 156 N.Y.S. 692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinions

BIJUR, J.

The plaintiff sues for the unearned premium on an insurance policy issued by defendant to him. Plaintiff tendered the return of a certificate of insurance held by him. This certificate shows : “Loss, if any, payable to Lawyers’ Mortgage Company, mortgagee,” etc.

As the interest of the mortgagee in the policy was one which could not be affected without its consent, it should, to say the least, have been made a party to the action. Lewis v. London & Lancashire Fire Ins. Co., 78 Misc. Rep. 176, 137 N. Y. Supp. 887.

Judgment reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

LEHMAN, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. v. Van Antwerp Realty Corp.
10 So. 2d 849 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 N.Y.S. 692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loew-v-north-british-mercantile-ins-nyappterm-1916.