Loew v. Loew
431 N.E.2d 306, 55 N.Y.2d 697, 446 N.Y.S.2d 945, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3254
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion by reversing, insofar as appealed from, so much of the order of Family Court as directed defendant to make child support payments (cf. Patron v Patron, 40 NY2d 582).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Loew v. Loew, 431 N.E.2d 306, 55 N.Y.2d 697, 446 N.Y.S.2d 945, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3254 (N.Y. 1981).
431 N.E.2d 306 (Loew v. Loew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tuchrello v. Tuchrello
204 A.D.2d 1020 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Riseley v. Riseley
173 A.D.2d 1103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)