Loew v. Austin

21 A. 240, 140 Pa. 41, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 798
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 16, 1891
DocketNo. 393
StatusPublished

This text of 21 A. 240 (Loew v. Austin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loew v. Austin, 21 A. 240, 140 Pa. 41, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 798 (Pa. 1891).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The learned judge below instructed the jury that, “ If you find that the yacht was specifically pledged, and continued so, and was sold by the defendant for more than enough to pay the plaintiff, the defendant must account to the plaintiff for the sum so received. The claim that the defendant has, out of the price received, paid bills of the club, and for supplies to the yacht, is no defence, and cannot be allowed as a set-off.” This charge was entirely accurate, and, as the jury have found in favor of the plaintiff all the facts referred to in the charge, there is no more to be said.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 A. 240, 140 Pa. 41, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loew-v-austin-pa-1891.