Loew v. Austin
This text of 21 A. 240 (Loew v. Austin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The learned judge below instructed the jury that, “ If you find that the yacht was specifically pledged, and continued so, and was sold by the defendant for more than enough to pay the plaintiff, the defendant must account to the plaintiff for the sum so received. The claim that the defendant has, out of the price received, paid bills of the club, and for supplies to the yacht, is no defence, and cannot be allowed as a set-off.” This charge was entirely accurate, and, as the jury have found in favor of the plaintiff all the facts referred to in the charge, there is no more to be said.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 A. 240, 140 Pa. 41, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loew-v-austin-pa-1891.