Loeschigk v. . Hatfield
51 N.Y. 660
Opinion
reads for affirmance.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Loeschigk v. . Hatfield, 51 N.Y. 660 (N.Y. 1873).
51 N.Y. 660 (Loeschigk v. . Hatfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Engelhard v. Schroeder
116 A. 717 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1921)
Russ v. Maxwell
94 A.D. 107 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)
Calhoun v. Calhoun
63 N.Y.S. 601 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
Commercial Bank of Rochester v. Bolton
35 N.Y.S. 138 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
The First National Bank of Peru v. Parsons
27 N.E. 486 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1891)
Patton v. Leftwich
6 L.R.A. 569 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1889)
Shattuck v. Chandler
20 P. 225 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1889)
Williams v. Whedon
46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 98 (New York Supreme Court, 1886)
Beste v. Burger
13 Daly 317 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1885)
Nelson v. Tenney
2 How. Pr. 272 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)