Loer v. Showalter

Indiana Supreme Court

Loer v. Showalter

15 Ind. 339, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 434

DecidedDecember 13, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 15 Ind. 339 (Loer v. Showalter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Loer v. Showalter, 15 Ind. 339, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 434 (Ind. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Guriam.

Suit on note. Cause continued to a special term, and set for the 22d of the month. It was not tried till four days later in the term. It is also alleged that there were some informalities in the adjourning order, &c.

The defendant appeared at the adjourned term, answered to the merits, went to trial by consent, and without objection. All irregularities were waived; and as the Court had jurisdiction, the judgment must be affirmed, with 5 per cent., damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Guriam.

Suit on note. Cause continued to a special term, and set for the 22d of the month. It was not tried till four days later in the term. It is also alleged that there were some informalities in the adjourning order, &c.

The defendant appeared at the adjourned term, answered to the merits, went to trial by consent, and without objection. All irregularities were waived; and as the Court had jurisdiction, the judgment must be affirmed, with 5 per cent., damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Ind. 339, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loer-v-showalter-ind-1860.