Loehn v. Rosenshien Associates, No. Cv86 23 53 73 (Dec. 26, 1991)

Connecticut Superior Court

Loehn v. Rosenshien Associates, No. Cv86 23 53 73 (Dec. 26, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 10829

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided December 26, 1991·No. No. CV86 23 53 73·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint (dated November 4, 1991) is granted as to requests 1-3; and denied as to request 4.

The objection to the addition of count 4 based on a violation of the statute of limitations is proper. See Bloniaz v. Bael, 2 Conn. L. Rrt. 721 (1990) and Felsted v. Kimberly Auto Services, Inc., 25 Conn. App. 665 (1991).

The proposed fourth count raises a new course of action sounding in intentional or absolute nuisance (DeLahunta v. Waterbury,134 Conn. 630, 634 (1948)) which does not relate back to the original complaint. See Patterson v. Szaba Food Service of New York, Inc., 14 Conn. App. 178 (1982).

Therefore the plaintiff is denied permission to amend her

KATZ, JUDGE CT Page 10830

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.] CT Page 10831

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.] CT Page 10832

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.] CT Page 10833

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.] CT Page 10834

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint (dated November 4, 1991) is granted as to requests 1-3; and denied as to request 4.

The objection to the addition of count 4 based on a violation of the statute of limitations is proper. See Bloniaz v. Bael, 2 Conn. L. Rrt. 721 (1990) and Felsted v. Kimberly Auto Services, Inc., 25 Conn. App. 665 (1991).

The proposed fourth count raises a new course of action sounding in intentional or absolute nuisance (DeLahunta v. Waterbury,134 Conn. 630, 634 (1948)) which does not relate back to the original complaint. See Patterson v. Szaba Food Service of New York, Inc., 14 Conn. App. 178 (1982).

Therefore the plaintiff is denied permission to amend her

KATZ, JUDGE CT Page 10830

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.] CT Page 10831

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.] CT Page 10832

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.] CT Page 10833

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.] CT Page 10834

Loehn v. Rosenshien Associates, No. Cv86 23 53 73 (Dec. 26, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 10829 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 10829 (Loehn v. Rosenshien Associates, No. Cv86 23 53 73 (Dec. 26, 1991)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related