Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Loeffler v. State

Loeffler v. State

832 So. 2d 261, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18096, 2002 WL 31757268
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 11, 2002
DocketNo. 2D02-2946
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 832 So. 2d 261 (Loeffler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loeffler v. State, 832 So. 2d 261, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18096, 2002 WL 31757268 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Vance Loeffler challenges the orders of the trial court summarily denying his motions filed pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.800(a). We affirm. Our affirmance of Loeffler’s rule 3.800(a) motion for jail credit is without prejudice to any right Loeffler might have to file a timely, facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion seeking credit against his prison sentence in the present case for time spent in the custody of the Department of Corrections from the date any Highlands County detainer was lodged against him. See Keene v. State, 816 So.2d 819, 820 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

Affirmed.

WHATLEY and STRINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Theoc v. State
832 So. 2d 261 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
832 So. 2d 261, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18096, 2002 WL 31757268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loeffler-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.