Loeber v. Roberts

The Superior Court of New York City

Loeber v. Roberts

26 Jones & S. 582, 58 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 582

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided May 5, 1890·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order should be modified so as to require defendant to furnish a bill of particulars specifying the materials referred to, or in case he states in the bill that he is unable to specify them, or any of them, to give a sufficient reason why he is unable to be more specific, and further to give the description of such materials as fully as he is able to. The order as thus modified should be affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The order should be modified so as to require defendant to furnish a bill of particulars specifying the materials referred to, or in case he states in the bill that he is unable to specify them, or any of them, to give a sufficient reason why he is unable to be more specific, and further to give the description of such materials as fully as he is able to. The order as thus modified should be affirmed with costs.

Loeber v. Roberts, 26 Jones & S. 582, 58 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 582 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

Pincite

26 Jones & S. 582 (Loeber v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.