Loeb v. Tepper
This text of 112 N.Y.S. 1043 (Loeb v. Tepper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action is for brokers’ commissions. The evidence does not establish any final consent of defendant to make [1044]*1044the exchange of property claimed by plaintiff to have been agreed upon with De Angelo, which alleged proposed exchange never took place, nor does the evidence clearly show that plaintiff was employed by defendant any more than by De Angelo. The judgment in plaintiff’s favor is clearly against the vast preponderance of evidence, nor can it be said to be supported by any satisfactory proof.
Judgment reversed and new' trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 N.Y.S. 1043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loeb-v-tepper-nyappterm-1908.