Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Loeb v. Teitelbaum

Loeb v. Teitelbaum

80 A.D.2d 838, 439 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10664
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 4, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by35 cases

This text of 80 A.D.2d 838 (Loeb v. Teitelbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loeb v. Teitelbaum, 80 A.D.2d 838, 439 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10664 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

Motion by appellants-respondents for reargument of the appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 12, 1979, which was decided by order of this court, dated October 22, 1980. Motion denied. On the court’s own motion, its decision dated October 22, 1980 [77 AD2d 92] is amended by adding a provision to its first decretal paragraph, further modifying the order appealed from, by deleting from the third decretal paragraph thereof, the words “on all issues”, and by inserting [839]*839therein the words, “on the issue of damages only”. Order dated October 22, 1980, entered on said decision, amended accordingly. The new trial, if one is to be held is limited to the issues of damages only. The jury’s verdict on the issue of liability has been affirmed. This affirmance does not imply, however, that relevant evidence, previously adduced as proof of the other elements of malicious prosecution but also to the issue of damages, is now precluded or unnecessary. Such evidence on all the issues will be admissible at the trial on the issue of damages, within the discretion of the trial court: Hopkins, J.P., Lazer, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Putnam v. County of Steuben
61 A.D.3d 1369 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Hernandez v. City of Rochester
260 F. Supp. 2d 599 (W.D. New York, 2003)
Britton v. Maloney
196 F.3d 24 (First Circuit, 1999)
Smith-Hunter v. Harvey
257 A.D.2d 239 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Cox v. Williams
593 N.W.2d 173 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1999)
Kurschus v. PaineWebber, Inc.
16 F. Supp. 2d 386 (S.D. New York, 1998)
Peterson v. County of Nassau
995 F. Supp. 305 (E.D. New York, 1998)
Hansel v. Sheridan
991 F. Supp. 69 (N.D. New York, 1998)
Gallagher v. State
176 Misc. 2d 226 (New York State Court of Claims, 1997)
Britton v. Maloney
981 F. Supp. 25 (D. Massachusetts, 1997)
Murphy v. Lynn
118 F.3d 938 (Second Circuit, 1997)
James A. Russell v. James Smith and City of New York
68 F.3d 33 (Second Circuit, 1995)
Hankins v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
208 A.D.2d 111 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Ward v. Silverberg
206 A.D.2d 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Buccieri v. Franzreb
201 A.D.2d 356 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Papa v. City of New York
194 A.D.2d 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Witcher v. Children's Television Workshop
187 A.D.2d 292 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Musto v. Arakel
184 A.D.2d 243 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Parkin v. Cornell University, Inc.
182 A.D.2d 850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Vitellaro v. Eagle Insurance
150 A.D.2d 770 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 A.D.2d 838, 439 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loeb-v-teitelbaum-nyappdiv-1981.