Loeb v. Nassau Electric Railroad

240 A.D. 912

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, there was sufficient proof of the retainer and acceptance thereof by the trial justice as counsel for plaintiff, and all proceedings before him, therefore, were without jurisdiction and void. (People v. Haas, 105 App. Div. 119; People v. Conner, 142 N. Y. 130; People v. Whitridge, No. 2, 144 App. Div. 493; Seaward v. Tasker, 143 N. Y. Supp. 257 [not officially published]; Oakley v. Aspinwall, 3 N. Y. 547; Elmira Realty Co. v. Gibson, 103 App. Div. 140.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Loeb v. Nassau Electric Railroad, 240 A.D. 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

240 A.D. 912 (Loeb v. Nassau Electric Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. . Connor
36 N.E. 807 (New York Court of Appeals, 1894)
Oakley v. . Aspinwall
3 N.Y. 547 (New York Court of Appeals, 1850)
Elmira Realty Co. v. Gibson
103 A.D. 140 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
People v. Haas
105 A.D. 119 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
People v. Whitridge
144 A.D. 493 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Seaward v. Tasker
143 N.Y.S. 257 (New York Supreme Court, 1913)