Loeb v. Loeb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Loeb v. Loeb

250 A.D. 880, 295 N.Y.S. 209, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9546

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D. 880 (Loeb v. Loeb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Loeb v. Loeb, 250 A.D. 880, 295 N.Y.S. 209, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9546 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Order dated February 17, 1937, referring defendant’s application to an official referee to hear and to determine what modification, if any, shall be made in the order dated August 5, 1936, directing defendant to pay temporary alimony of $100 per week and counsel fee of $1,000, in the order dated August 14, 1936, denying motion for resettlement, and in the order dated September 15, 1936, directing defendant to pay $250 as [881]*881counsel fee upon Ms appeal from the aforementioned orders reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. If the defendant had followed the suggestion made by tMs court on the former appeal [249 App. Div. 629], the question of alimony would have been determined at the trial, wMch could have been had by now. Referring the question of counsel fee is in effect to have the official referee review the determination of tMs court. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ.. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order dated February 17, 1937, referring defendant’s application to an official referee to hear and to determine what modification, if any, shall be made in the order dated August 5, 1936, directing defendant to pay temporary alimony of $100 per week and counsel fee of $1,000, in the order dated August 14, 1936, denying motion for resettlement, and in the order dated September 15, 1936, directing defendant to pay $250 as [881]*881counsel fee upon Ms appeal from the aforementioned orders reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. If the defendant had followed the suggestion made by tMs court on the former appeal [249 App. Div. 629], the question of alimony would have been determined at the trial, wMch could have been had by now. Referring the question of counsel fee is in effect to have the official referee review the determination of tMs court. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ.. concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D. 880, 295 N.Y.S. 209, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loeb-v-loeb-nyappdiv-1937.