Loeb v. Kent

Ohio Circuit Courts

Loeb v. Kent

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 520

DecidedJune 15, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 520 (Loeb v. Kent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Loeb v. Kent, 21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 520 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

SWING, J.

No transcript of the final record or transcript of the docket or journal entries in this ease was filed in this’court until long after the four months from the rendition of the judgment complained of, and not for more than four months after the petition in error had been filed. This court therefore has acquired no jurisdiction to hear and determine whether the judgment is correct or not. Second Nat. Bank v. Moderwell, 59 Ohio St. 221 [52 N. E. Rep. 194]; Falconer v. Martin, 66 Ohio St. 352, 356 [64 N. E. Rep. 430].

The action in this court should be dismissed.

Giffen and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SWING, J.

No transcript of the final record or transcript of the docket or journal entries in this ease was filed in this’court until long after the four months from the rendition of the judgment complained of, and not for more than four months after the petition in error had been filed. This court therefore has acquired no jurisdiction to hear and determine whether the judgment is correct or not. Second Nat. Bank v. Moderwell, 59 Ohio St. 221 [52 N. E. Rep. 194]; Falconer v. Martin, 66 Ohio St. 352, 356 [64 N. E. Rep. 430].

The action in this court should be dismissed.

Giffen and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loeb-v-kent-ohiocirct-1909.