Loeb v. Gurtman
35 A.2d 894, 131 N.J.L. 227, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 181
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Colie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, ITeher, Porter, Dear, Wells, Bapperty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.
Fo r reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Loeb v. Gurtman, 35 A.2d 894, 131 N.J.L. 227, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 181 (N.J. 1944).
35 A.2d 894 (Loeb v. Gurtman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.