Loeb v. Gurtman

35 A.2d 894, 131 N.J.L. 227, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 181
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 27, 1944
StatusPublished

This text of 35 A.2d 894 (Loeb v. Gurtman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loeb v. Gurtman, 35 A.2d 894, 131 N.J.L. 227, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 181 (N.J. 1944).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Colie in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, ITeher, Porter, Dear, Wells, Bapperty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.

Fo r reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 A.2d 894, 131 N.J.L. 227, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loeb-v-gurtman-nj-1944.