LoDuca, J. v. McGinley, T.
This text of LoDuca, J. v. McGinley, T. (LoDuca, J. v. McGinley, T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
JOSEPH LODUCA, : No. 86 MM 2023 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : THOMAS MCGINLEY, SUPERINTENDENT, : COAL TOWNSHIP, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, : SNYDER COUNTY, MICHELLE HENRY, : ATTORNEY GENERAL, PENNSYLVANIA, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2023, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and the
Application for Leave to File Response are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
LoDuca, J. v. McGinley, T., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loduca-j-v-mcginley-t-pa-2023.