Lodrigues v. Duhe

983 So. 2d 1287, 2008 La. LEXIS 1519, 2008 WL 2716770
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 27, 2008·No. No. 2008-CC-0916·Published

Opinion

In re Lodrigues, Loretta D/B/A; Loretta Lodrigues Insurance Agency Inc.;— Plaintiff(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. John, 40th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 47192; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 08-C-203.

[1288]*1288Granted. Because the question of when prescription commenced is so intertwined with the merits of plaintiffs’ claim, we find defendants’ exception of prescription should be referred to the merits. See Short v. Griffin, 95-0680 (La.6/16/95), 656 So.2d 635. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

VICTORY, J., would deny. TRAYLOR, J., would deny. WEIMER, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lodrigues v. Duhe, 983 So. 2d 1287, 2008 La. LEXIS 1519, 2008 WL 2716770 (La. 2008).

983 So. 2d 1287 (Lodrigues v. Duhe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Short v. Griffin
656 So. 2d 635 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1995)