Lodhi v. Fairfax County

Fourth Circuit

Lodhi v. Fairfax County

515 F. App'x 204

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 28, 2013·No. No. 12-2564·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Saad Usman Lodhi appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lodhi v. Fairfax Cnty., No. l:12-cv-01108-JCC-JFA (E.D.Va. Dec. 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Saad Usman Lodhi appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lodhi v. Fairfax Cnty., No. l:12-cv-01108-JCC-JFA (E.D.Va. Dec. 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Lodhi v. Fairfax County, 515 F. App'x 204 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

515 F. App'x 204 (Lodhi v. Fairfax County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related