Lodge v. O'Toole

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Lodge v. O'Toole

39 A. 752, 20 R.I. 405, 1898 R.I. LEXIS 71

DecidedMarch 2, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A. 752 (Lodge v. O'Toole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lodge v. O'Toole, 39 A. 752, 20 R.I. 405, 1898 R.I. LEXIS 71 (R.I. 1898).

Pincite

Opinions

Matteson, C. J.

The slander complained of is that the plaintiff was intoxicated to such a degree as to amount to a violation of decency. The offence of intoxication amounting to a violation of decency is not an offence at common law or by statute. It is made such merely by ordinances of the several towns and cities. In Seery v. Viall, 16 R. I. 517, it was held that, though words charging an offence involving moral turpitude and liable to punishment at common law or by statute are actionable per se, a charge of drunkenness, as it does not involve moral turpitude and is not an offence either at ■common law or by statute, but only by ordinance, is not actionable per se. We are of the opinion that the present suit *406 is within this decision, and, consequently, that, as the declaration alleges no special damages, the motion in arrest of judgment must be sustained.

C. Frank Parkhurst, for plaintiff. James A. Williams, for defendant.

Judgment arrested, and case remitted to the Common Pleas-Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matteson, C. J.

The slander complained of is that the plaintiff was intoxicated to such a degree as to amount to a violation of decency. The offence of intoxication amounting to a violation of decency is not an offence at common law or by statute. It is made such merely by ordinances of the several towns and cities. In Seery v. Viall, 16 R. I. 517, it was held that, though words charging an offence involving moral turpitude and liable to punishment at common law or by statute are actionable per se, a charge of drunkenness, as it does not involve moral turpitude and is not an offence either at ■common law or by statute, but only by ordinance, is not actionable per se. We are of the opinion that the present suit *406 is within this decision, and, consequently, that, as the declaration alleges no special damages, the motion in arrest of judgment must be sustained.

C. Frank Parkhurst, for plaintiff. James A. Williams, for defendant.

Judgment arrested, and case remitted to the Common Pleas-Division.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A. 752, 20 R.I. 405, 1898 R.I. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lodge-v-otoole-ri-1898.