Loder v. Scofield

New York Supreme Court

Loder v. Scofield

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 101, 1 Cole. Cas. 98

DecidedApril 15, 1800

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 101 (Loder v. Scofield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Loder v. Scofield, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 101, 1 Cole. Cas. 98 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

Pincite

Opinion

MUNRO stated that the tenant had, at a previous term, demanded view, but that the demandant had not issued the writ, and now he renewed his motion, that the demandant sue out the writ of view, and cause view to be given by the first day of next term, or be nonsuited : and cited Booth, 40. to show, that though a view be granted at the instance of the tenant, the demandant is bound to sue it out.

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MUNRO stated that the tenant had, at a previous term, demanded view, but that the demandant had not issued the writ, and now he renewed his motion, that the demandant sue out the writ of view, and cause view to be given by the first day of next term, or be nonsuited : and cited Booth, 40. to show, that though a view be granted at the instance of the tenant, the demandant is bound to sue it out.

Rule granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 101, 1 Cole. Cas. 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loder-v-scofield-nysupct-1800.