Loddy v. State
498 P.2d 1341, 88 Nev. 432, 1972 Nev. LEXIS 490
Opinion
OPINION
Convicted of receiving stolen property in violation of NRS 205.275, appellant’s principal assignment of error is that there was a break in the “chain of custody” of corpus of the theft, [433] between the time it was recovered and the time it was introduced into evidence at appellant’s trial. In the facts of this case, we believe the chain of custody was adequately established. Cf. Eisentrager v. State, 79 Nev. 38, 378 P.2d 526 (1963).
Other assignments of error are equally without merit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Loddy v. State, 498 P.2d 1341, 88 Nev. 432, 1972 Nev. LEXIS 490 (Neb. 1972).
498 P.2d 1341 (Loddy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eisentrager v. State
378 P.2d 526 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1963)