Loddy v. State
This text of 498 P.2d 1341 (Loddy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Convicted of receiving stolen property in violation of NRS 205.275, appellant’s principal assignment of error is that there was a break in the “chain of custody” of corpus of the theft, [433]*433between the time it was recovered and the time it was introduced into evidence at appellant’s trial. In the facts of this case, we believe the chain of custody was adequately established. Cf. Eisentrager v. State, 79 Nev. 38, 378 P.2d 526 (1963).
Other assignments of error are equally without merit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
498 P.2d 1341, 88 Nev. 432, 1972 Nev. LEXIS 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loddy-v-state-nev-1972.