Loddy v. State

498 P.2d 1341, 88 Nev. 432, 1972 Nev. LEXIS 490
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 19, 1972
DocketNo. 6740
StatusPublished

This text of 498 P.2d 1341 (Loddy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Loddy v. State, 498 P.2d 1341, 88 Nev. 432, 1972 Nev. LEXIS 490 (Neb. 1972).

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Convicted of receiving stolen property in violation of NRS 205.275, appellant’s principal assignment of error is that there was a break in the “chain of custody” of corpus of the theft, [433]*433between the time it was recovered and the time it was introduced into evidence at appellant’s trial. In the facts of this case, we believe the chain of custody was adequately established. Cf. Eisentrager v. State, 79 Nev. 38, 378 P.2d 526 (1963).

Other assignments of error are equally without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eisentrager v. State
378 P.2d 526 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
498 P.2d 1341, 88 Nev. 432, 1972 Nev. LEXIS 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loddy-v-state-nev-1972.