Locust v. Perry

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: September 25, 2002
• Docket: 02-1346
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1346

ELDER DEFORRORRORA LOCUST,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES S. PERRY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-02-18-H)

Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 25, 2002

Before LUTTIG, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elder Deforrorrora Locust, Appellant Pro Se. James Stockton Perry, PERRY, PERRY & PERRY, Kinston, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Elder Deforrorrora Locust appeals in this civil case, arguing

that the district court improperly failed to grant his motion for

default. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED