Locust v. Perry
47 F. App'x 648
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 25, 2002·No. No. 02-1346·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Elder Deforrorrora Locust appeals in this civil case, arguing that the district court improperly failed to grant his motion for default. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Locust v. Perry, 47 F. App'x 648 (4th Cir. 2002).
47 F. App'x 648 (Locust v. Perry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
John Doe v. Marymount Univ.
297 F. Supp. 3d 573 (E.D. Virginia, 2018)
Tibbetts v. Levin
288 F. App'x 743 (Second Circuit, 2008)
Tibbetts v. Stempel
354 F. Supp. 2d 137 (D. Connecticut, 2005)