Locus v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Locus v. State

785 So. 2d 594, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5053, 2001 WL 376442

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 17, 2001

DocketNo. 1D00-1631

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 785 So. 2d 594 (Locus v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Locus v. State, 785 So. 2d 594, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5053, 2001 WL 376442 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s conviction. However, the trial court did not have jurisdiction to hold a restitution hearing once the appellant filed a notice of appeal. See Brantley v. State, 723 So.2d 909 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). As a result, we reverse and remand for the trial court to conduct another hearing and impose restitution again should it elect to do so.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings.

BARFIELD, C.J., WOLF and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s conviction. However, the trial court did not have jurisdiction to hold a restitution hearing once the appellant filed a notice of appeal. See Brantley v. State, 723 So.2d 909 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). As a result, we reverse and remand for the trial court to conduct another hearing and impose restitution again should it elect to do so.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings.

BARFIELD, C.J., WOLF and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

785 So. 2d 594, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5053, 2001 WL 376442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/locus-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack