Locus v. State
785 So. 2d 594, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5053, 2001 WL 376442
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 17, 2001·No. No. 1D00-1631·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm the appellant’s conviction. However, the trial court did not have jurisdiction to hold a restitution hearing once the appellant filed a notice of appeal. See Brantley v. State, 723 So.2d 909 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). As a result, we reverse and remand for the trial court to conduct another hearing and impose restitution again should it elect to do so.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Locus v. State, 785 So. 2d 594, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5053, 2001 WL 376442 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
785 So. 2d 594 (Locus v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fisher v. State
124 So. 3d 413 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Queen v. State
832 So. 2d 956 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)