Lockwood v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.

142 Misc. 470, 254 N.Y.S. 573, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 968
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 7, 1931·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Rodenbeck, J.

The plaintiff is the widow and administratrix of Glenn Lockwood, and is seeking to recover damages for negligence causing the death of the decedent. She is not familiar with the apparatus, machinery and safety devices involved in the work in which the decedent was engaged, or with the conditions under which he worked, and is asking for an examination of officers and employees of defendant to enable her to frame her complaint. There is authority, under the present practice, as there was under the old practice, to have an examination before trial in a proper case, in order to frame a complaint. Such an examination, however, will be permitted only where the plaintiff desires it for the purpose of stating, with sufficient definiteness and certainty, a good complaint. She should have an examination to enable her to state all the grounds of negligence upon which she claims to be entitled to recover.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lockwood v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co., 142 Misc. 470, 254 N.Y.S. 573, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 968 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1931).

142 Misc. 470 (Lockwood v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Roland
10 A.D.2d 263 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Wollen v. B. R. De Witt, Inc.
17 Misc. 2d 754 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
In re Dewhirst
4 Misc. 2d 756 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Fisher v. Smith
243 N.W. 4 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1932)