Lockwood Trade Journal v. New York Silicate Book Slate Co.

88 N.Y.S. 152

This text of 88 N.Y.S. 152 (Lockwood Trade Journal v. New York Silicate Book Slate Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lockwood Trade Journal v. New York Silicate Book Slate Co., 88 N.Y.S. 152 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There was an undisputed liability on the part of the a cannot There was no competent legal proof offered by the defendant upon the trial in contradiction of the plaintiff’s testimony that the defendant’s postdated check of May 22, 1902, for $48.37, had been returned before May 22d. A plea of payment by a postdated check which has been returned is not available. Bradford v. Fox, 38 N. Y. 289. The motion for a direction of a verdict should have been granted.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bradford v. . Fox
38 N.Y. 289 (New York Court of Appeals, 1868)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 N.Y.S. 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lockwood-trade-journal-v-new-york-silicate-book-slate-co-nyappterm-1904.