Lockwood and Lyons v. State

18 S.W.2d 671, 112 Tex. Crim. 643, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 500
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 6, 1929·No. No. 12314.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

— This case is before us on a writ of error. Review of a final judgment forfeiting an appearance bond is sought.

For a discussion of the questions presented by the record herein see Opinion Number 12313, Louise Magless et al. v. State of Texas, opinion rendered March 6, 1929, and not yet reported. The same questions being involved as were presented, in the case referred to, the judgment here must also be affirmed. The judgment of the court below is reformed so as to bear no interest.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

- The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lockwood and Lyons v. State, 18 S.W.2d 671, 112 Tex. Crim. 643, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 500 (Tex. 1929).

18 S.W.2d 671 (Lockwood and Lyons v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evans v. Pringle
634 S.W.2d 774 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)