Lockman v. Alber

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lockman v. Alber

218 S.W.3d 563, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 195, 2007 WL 330505

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 6, 2007·No. ED 87728·Published

Opinion

*564 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Judith Alber (Defendant) appeals from the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, awarding Norma Lockman (Plaintiff) $75,686.57 on her claim of fraudulent misrepresentation against Defendant. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for then' information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*564 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Judith Alber (Defendant) appeals from the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, awarding Norma Lockman (Plaintiff) $75,686.57 on her claim of fraudulent misrepresentation against Defendant. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for then' information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Lockman v. Alber, 218 S.W.3d 563, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 195, 2007 WL 330505 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

218 S.W.3d 563 (Lockman v. Alber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.