Locklin v. Locklin

60 S.E.2d 362, 207 Ga. 134, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 413
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 11, 1950
DocketNo. 17129
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 S.E.2d 362 (Locklin v. Locklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Locklin v. Locklin, 60 S.E.2d 362, 207 Ga. 134, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 413 (Ga. 1950).

Opinion

Head, Justice.

1. Ground 4 of the amended motion for new trial is incomplete and presents no question for determination by this court.

2. The judge did not err in refusing to grant a nonsuit.

3. It is never error to refuse to direct a verdict.

4. The verdict is not without evidence to support it, and the judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial as amended. Code, § 85-1001; Baker v. Shepherd, 37 Ga. 12.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Wesley G. Bailey, for plaintiff in error. Newell Edenfield, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Smith
135 S.E.2d 866 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 S.E.2d 362, 207 Ga. 134, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/locklin-v-locklin-ga-1950.