Locklear v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Locklear v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

854 So. 2d 832, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14061, 2003 WL 22148899

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 19, 2003

DocketNo. 5D03-14

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 854 So. 2d 832 (Locklear v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Locklear v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 854 So. 2d 832, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14061, 2003 WL 22148899 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joanna M. Locklear seeks review of an Unemployment Appeals Commission order denying her claim for unemployment compensation benefits. As is often the case, the record reveals a conflict in the evidence regarding the reason Ms. Locklear’s employment with Marcus M. Cornelius, III & Associates, P.A., ended.

Our review of the record reveals that the Commission’s determination that Ms. Locklear voluntarily left her employment, and is therefore not entitled to benefits is supported by competent, substantial evidence. De Groot v. Sheffield, 95 So.2d 912 (Fla.1957). Accordingly, the Commission’s order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, PLEUS and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI