Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Locklear v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

Locklear v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

854 So. 2d 832, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14061, 2003 WL 22148899
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 19, 2003·No. No. 5D03-14·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joanna M. Locklear seeks review of an Unemployment Appeals Commission order denying her claim for unemployment compensation benefits. As is often the case, the record reveals a conflict in the evidence regarding the reason Ms. Locklear’s employment with Marcus M. Cornelius, III & Associates, P.A., ended.

Our review of the record reveals that the Commission’s determination that Ms. Locklear voluntarily left her employment, and is therefore not entitled to benefits is supported by competent, substantial evidence. De Groot v. Sheffield, 95 So.2d 912 (Fla.1957). Accordingly, the Commission’s order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, PLEUS and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Locklear v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 854 So. 2d 832, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14061, 2003 WL 22148899 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

854 So. 2d 832 (Locklear v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Moore
854 So. 2d 832 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)