Locklear v. Kijakazi

District Court, E.D. North Carolina·Decided January 12, 2022·No. 7:21-cv-00060·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION Civ. No. 7:21-cv-00060-FL ANN LOCKLEAR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ORDER KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Defendant’s Motion for Remand to the Commissioner. Plaintiff, through counsel, consent to Defendant’s Motion for Remand to the Commissioner. For good cause shown, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remands the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED this 12th _ day of January, 2022.

_ Mer al. here LOUISE W. FLANAGAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Locklear v. Kijakazi, (E.D.N.C. 2022).

Locklear v. Kijakazi (Locklear v. Kijakazi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Melkonyan v. Sullivan
501 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1991)