Locklear v. Harrison

Fourth Circuit

Locklear v. Harrison

333 F. App'x 717

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 8, 2009·No. No. 09-6487·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timmie Russell Locklear appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Locklear’s motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Locklear v. Harrison, No. 5:08-ct-03132-H (E.D.N.C. March 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[718] tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timmie Russell Locklear appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Locklear’s motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Locklear v. Harrison, No. 5:08-ct-03132-H (E.D.N.C. March 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con[718] tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Locklear v. Harrison, 333 F. App'x 717 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

333 F. App'x 717 (Locklear v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related