Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Space Systems/Loral, Inc.

43 F. App'x 372
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJuly 16, 2002
DocketNo. 00-1310
StatusPublished

This text of 43 F. App'x 372 (Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Space Systems/Loral, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Space Systems/Loral, Inc., 43 F. App'x 372 (Fed. Cir. 2002).

Opinion

ORDER

The court has received a certified copy of the judgment from the clerk of the Supreme Court in Lockheed Martin Corporation v. Space Systems/Loral, Inc., — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 2322, 153 L.Ed.2d 151 (2002). The Supreme Court vacated this court’s judgment in Lockheed Martin, v. Space Systems, 249 F.3d 1314 (Fed.Cir.2001), and remanded for further consideration in light of Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1831, 152 L.Ed.2d 944 (2002).

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The mandate is recalled and the appeal is reinstated.

(2) The case shall be returned for consideration to the original merits panel.

(3) The parties shall simultaneously file briefs, not to exceed 20 pages, on the [373]*373impact of the Supreme Court’s Festo decision on the issues before the panel, specifically regarding the doctrine of equivalents, and prosecution history estoppel. The briefs are due on August 5, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.
535 U.S. 722 (Supreme Court, 2002)
Pioneer Magnetics, Inc. v. Micro Linear Corp.
535 U.S. 1108 (Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 F. App'x 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lockheed-martin-corp-v-space-systemsloral-inc-cafc-2002.