Lockhart v. State

137 S.E. 800, 36 Ga. App. 614, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 187
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 12, 1927
Docket17355
StatusPublished

This text of 137 S.E. 800 (Lockhart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lockhart v. State, 137 S.E. 800, 36 Ga. App. 614, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 187 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Under the decision of the Supreme Court in this ease, in answer to questions certified by this court (164 Ga. 15, 137 S. E. 549), and the agreed statement of facts filed in the trial court, the judgment excepted to was not error for any reason assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Cohen & Gray, Adams & Adams, for plaintiffs in error. Wright & Jackson, George M. Napier, attorney-general, David C. Barrow, Hitch, Denmark & Lovett, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lockhart v. State
137 S.E. 549 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 S.E. 800, 36 Ga. App. 614, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lockhart-v-state-gactapp-1927.