Lockhart v. State

137 S.E. 800, 36 Ga. App. 614, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 187
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 12, 1927·No. 17355·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

Under the decision of the Supreme Court in this ease, in answer to questions certified by this court (164 Ga. 15, 137 S. E. 549), and the agreed statement of facts filed in the trial court, the judgment excepted to was not error for any reason assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Cohen & Gray, Adams & Adams, for plaintiffs in error. Wright & Jackson, George M. Napier, attorney-general, David C. Barrow, Hitch, Denmark & Lovett, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lockhart v. State, 137 S.E. 800, 36 Ga. App. 614, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 187 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

137 S.E. 800 (Lockhart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lockhart v. State
137 S.E. 549 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)