Lockhart v. Middleton

443 S.W.3d 662, 2014 WL 2739406, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 676
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 17, 2014·No. No. WD 77048·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth G. Middleton filed a motion to compel satisfaction of judgment pursuant to Rule 74.11(c),1 in which he argued that a wrongful death judgment against him was presumptively paid under section 516.350. The trial court summarily denied the motion, and Middleton appealed. Because Middleton failed to show that any judgment creditor or person actually received satisfaction of the subject judgment, we affirm the trial court’s denial of his motion to compel satisfaction of judgment.

The order is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lockhart v. Middleton, 443 S.W.3d 662, 2014 WL 2739406, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 676 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

443 S.W.3d 662 (Lockhart v. Middleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.