Lockhart v. Hamlin
143 A.D. 918, 127 N.Y.S. 1129
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1911
StatusPublished
This text of 143 A.D. 918 (Lockhart v. Hamlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lockhart v. Hamlin, 143 A.D. 918, 127 N.Y.S. 1129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., and Williams, J., who dissented upon the ground that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover upon quantum meruit under the allegations in his complaint. (See 190 N. Y. 132.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lockhart v. . Hamlin
82 N.E. 1094 (New York Court of Appeals, 1907)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
143 A.D. 918, 127 N.Y.S. 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lockhart-v-hamlin-nyappdiv-1911.